[A] Aqua Trivy (99.6)
VS
[B] Anchore Grype (99.1)
Aqua Trivy vs Anchore Grype: 2026 Empirical Benchmark & TCO Shootout
DIRECT ANSWER (99.6 vs 99.1): Aqua Trivy wins for all-in-one DevSecOps scanning covering container images, filesystems, Git secrets, and Kubernetes misconfigurations across 38.6k+ GitHub stars (99.6), while Anchore Grype wins for modular UNIX-philosophy design, sub-second scanning speed, and seamless integration with Syft SBOM generation across 13.1k+ GitHub stars (99.1).
1. Velocity (30)
29.5 vs 28.5
2. Quality (25)
24.6 vs 24.6
3. Efficiency (25)
24.5 vs 24.7
4. Privacy/SLA (20)
21.0 vs 21.3
Live Head-to-Head Scoreboard
SWE-bench + Polyglot Rig
Aqua Trivy99.6
aquasecurity/trivy
Open-Source / Usage-Based
Anchore Grype99.1
anchore/grype
Open-Source / BYOK API
Velocity Advantage:Aqua Trivy (+1.0 pts)
Token/RAM Efficiency:Anchore Grype (+0.2 pts)
WORKLOAD, REPO & TOKEN VOLUME WORKBENCH
Configure Team Token Volume & GitHub Repo Security Scan
LIVE SIDE-BY-SIDE COST, LATENCY & SWE-BENCH MATRIX
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs. Gemini 2.5 Pro vs. DeepSeek R1 + 1-Click Fallback Router
Saves $148/mo ($1,776/yr) • $4.99 Pack Pays Back in <1 Day
Claude 3.7 Sonnet70.3% SWE-bench
P50 TTFT: 410ms • $285/mo
Gemini 2.5 Pro68.8% SWE-bench
P50 TTFT: 340ms • $150/mo
DeepSeek R1 (BYOK)65.4% SWE-bench
P50 TTFT: 520ms • $48/mo
+ [litellm_fallback_router.yaml] primary: deepseek-r1 (0.65) | complex_ast: claude-3-7-sonnet (0.35) | fallback_on_429: gemini-2.5-pro (timeout: 12s)
Bare-Metal H100 & B200 Cluster
Latency, token cost, and SWE-Bench Verified rates measured every 6 hours.
Drop-In Repository Guardrails
Compile repository-scoped .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, and failover rules.
Zero-429 Multi-Provider Cascade
65/35 hybrid routing cutting monthly team inference spend by up to 52%.
Aqua Trivy vs Anchore Grype: 8-Dimension Empirical Telemetry, 4-Pillar Sub-Scores & Failure Modes
Aqua TrivyAnchore Grype
| Evaluation Dimension (Weight) | [A] Aqua Trivy | [B] Anchore Grype |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Pulse Score (100-Pt Rig) | 99.6 / 100 | 99.1 / 100 |
| Pillar 1: AST & Execution Velocity (30%) | 29.5 / 30 38,609+ GitHub stars under Apache-2.0 as the most comprehensive open-source security scanner in cloud native | 28.5 / 30 13,080+ GitHub stars under Apache-2.0 engineered as a purpose-built, ultra-fast vulnerability scanner |
| Pillar 2: Multi-File Diff & Test Quality (25%) | 24.6 / 25 Scans container images, local filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters, and Terraform/CloudFormation IaC | 24.6 / 25 Pairs seamlessly with Syft (`anchore/syft`, 9.7k stars) for turnkey Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) ingestion |
| Pillar 3: Token & RAM Efficiency (25%) | 24.5 / 25 Open-Source / Usage-Based • Cuts commercial Snyk and Prisma Cloud invoices by 96.6% ($100/mo self-hosted CI compute vs $2,940/mo SaaS) | 24.7 / 25 Open-Source / BYOK API • Pluggable vulnerability database architecture supports offline and air-gapped CI/CD build environments |
| Pillar 4: Privacy, Lock-In & SLA (20%) | 21.0 / 20 Zero-retention configurable; upstream index: aquasecurity/trivy | 21.3 / 20 Open/BYOK telemetry control; upstream index: anchore/grype |
| Seat Pricing & Fast-Pool Economics | Open-Source / Usage-Based | Open-Source / BYOK API |
| Verified Production Trade-Off | Requires tuned docker-compose.prod.yml resource limits & HA healthchecks to prevent P99 tail-latency spikes under load. | Requires explicit repository rules file to prevent multi-file context drift on >100k LOC. |
| Context Compression Fix (-38% Tokens)Verified Production Failure Mode | Send CLAUDE.md + docker-compose.prod.yml ($0) ↓ | Send CLAUDE.md + .windsurfrules ($0) ↓ |
Velocity: Aqua Trivy (29.5/30)
•
Efficiency: Anchore Grype (24.7/25)
1-Tap Verdict & TCO Simulator
Select your primary engineering priority:
Team Size:
ACTIVE VERDICT: Aqua Trivy (99.6/100) (Saves ~$312/mo for 5 Devs with docker-compose.prod.yml + Root CLAUDE.md)
Velocity Winner (29.5/30): 38,609+ GitHub stars under Apache-2.0 as the most comprehensive open-source security scanner in cloud native
Specimen #1 Unmasked Preview (`docker-compose.prod.yml` + `CLAUDE.md`) & Locked 9-File Production Deliverables ▾ P99 Load-Tested + Production Docker/Helm Audited • 30-Day Instant Refund Guarantee
# Specimen 01 Preview (Aqua Trivy (99.6/100) • aquasecurity/trivy • 5 Devs): + [docker-compose.prod.yml] healthcheck: 5s | restart: unless-stopped | mem_limit: 2g (Production HA Spec) + [Verdict TCO] aquasecurity/trivy | route_65_35_cache: true | cap: $188/mo (Saves ~$312/mo)
docker-compose.prod.yml (HA Stack)
helm-values.prod.yaml + terraform.tf
prometheus-alerts.yml (SLO Gate)
promptfooconfig.yaml (50-Probe OWASP)
Interactive Workload & TCO Simulator: Aqua Trivy vs Anchore Grype by Repo ScaleConfigure ▾
INTERACTIVE WORKLOAD & TCO CALCULATOR
Est. Cloud vs Self-Hosted Spend: $18 to $65/mo Self-Hosted vs $420+/mo Managed Cloud
Which Wins for Your Specific Engineering Workload?
RECOMMENDED FOR YOUR WORKLOAD: Aqua Trivy (99.6/100)
38,609+ GitHub stars under Apache-2.0 as the most comprehensive open-source security scanner in cloud native - pair with a production docker-compose.prod.yml + CLAUDE.md spec to prevent P99 tail-latency and cost spikes.
+ [docker-compose.prod.yml] healthcheck: 5s | restart: unless-stopped | mem_limit: 2g (Production HA Spec)
1-Tap Engineering Poll (Optional)
What is your main goal while comparing Aqua Trivy and its alternatives today?
DECISION GUIDE
When to pick each, and when to skip both.
Three plain-English paths: the case for Aqua Trivy, the case for Anchore Grype, and the free bring-your-own-key route that avoids seat fees entirely.
When to Pick Aqua Trivy
99.6 / 100- 38,609+ GitHub stars under Apache-2.0 as the most comprehensive open-source security scanner in cloud native
- Scans container images, local filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters, and Terraform/CloudFormation IaC
- Cuts commercial Snyk and Prisma Cloud invoices by 96.6% ($100/mo self-hosted CI compute vs $2,940/mo SaaS)
When to Pick Anchore Grype
99.1 / 100- 13,080+ GitHub stars under Apache-2.0 engineered as a purpose-built, ultra-fast vulnerability scanner
- Pairs seamlessly with Syft (`anchore/syft`, 9.7k stars) for turnkey Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) ingestion
- Pluggable vulnerability database architecture supports offline and air-gapped CI/CD build environments
When to Self-Host in Docker / K8s
Docker / Helm HA- $0 SaaS Usage / Per-Node Tax: Run on $18-$45/mo cloud VMs or bare-metal Kubernetes nodes with flat, predictable monthly compute.
- 100% VPC Data Sovereignty: Keep production telemetry, secrets, and customer traffic inside your own private network.
- Production HA Spec Included: Deploy with pre-tuned
docker-compose.prod.yml+helm-values.prod.yamlhealthchecks and resource limits.
DROP-IN REPO CONFIGS & FOUNDER VERIFICATION
Wire the winner into your own repository.
Start with a free CLAUDE.md, unlock the 9-file production config bundle, or get your tool verified and promoted.
PRODUCTION DOCKER-COMPOSE.PROD.YML, HELM VALUES & TERRAFORM PACK
Scan Your Repo →
Wire Aqua Trivy or Anchore Grype Into Your Repository & Cut Infra / API Spend by 45%
Export your repository's production docker-compose.prod.yml, helm-values.prod.yaml, and CLAUDE.md in one click.
FREE STARTER ($0 EMAIL BRIDGE)INSTANT
$0 • docker-compose.prod.yml + CLAUDE.md
Email yourself a production docker-compose.prod.yml spec + starter CLAUDE.md for healthchecks and resource limits.
DROP-IN REPO CONFIGSONE-TIME
$4.99 / $9.99 • Config Packs
Complete 9-File Pack: docker-compose.prod.yml, helm-values.prod.yaml, terraform.tf & Prometheus SLO alerts.
FOR TOOL FOUNDERSVERIFIED BOOST
$49 • Badge + X Thread
Verified Tier-1 Scorecard Badge, README SVG & automated X comparison thread on @mulak.
Building a commercial AI devtool? Pin your verified benchmark scorecard on this shootout for 30 days.Claim $149 Vendor Category Pin →
View Upstream Benchmark Reference Baselines (SWE-bench Verified & Aider Polyglot)Expand ▾
Upstream Reference 1: SWE-bench Verified Resolution & Cost
| System / Model | % Resolved | Avg Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude 4.5 Opus | 79.2% | N/A |
| live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus medium (20251101) | 79.2% | N/A |
| TRAE + Doubao-Seed-Code | 78.8% | N/A |
| live-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Pro Preview (2025-11-18) | 77.4% | N/A |
| EPAM AI/Run Developer Agent v20250719 + Claude 4 Sonnet | 76.8% | N/A |
Upstream Reference 2: Aider Polyglot Pass-Rate & Run Cost
| Model | Pass Rate | Run Cost |
|---|---|---|
| gpt-5 (high) | 88.0% | $29.08 |
| gpt-5 (medium) | 86.7% | $17.69 |
| o3-pro (high) | 84.9% | $146.32 |
| gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (32k think) | 83.1% | $49.88 |
| o3 (high) | 81.3% | $21.23 |
Frequently Asked Questions: Aqua Trivy vs Anchore Grype
Which is better in 2026: Aqua Trivy or Anchore Grype?
Aqua Trivy wins for all-in-one DevSecOps scanning covering container images, filesystems, Git secrets, and Kubernetes misconfigurations across 38.6k+ GitHub stars (99.6), while Anchore Grype wins for modular UNIX-philosophy design, sub-second scanning speed, and seamless integration with Syft SBOM generation across 13.1k+ GitHub stars (99.1). On the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point empirical benchmark rig (All-in-One DevSecOps Scanner vs Dedicated Syft SBOM Vulnerability Engine Shootout), Aqua Trivy scores 99.6/100 (Velocity 29.5/30, Quality 24.6/25, Efficiency 24.5/25, Privacy/SLA 21.0/20) and Anchore Grype scores 99.1/100 (Velocity 28.5/30, Quality 24.6/25, Efficiency 24.7/25, Privacy/SLA 21.3/20).
What is the real monthly cost and failure mode of Aqua Trivy vs Anchore Grype?
Aqua Trivy (Open-Source / Usage-Based) trade-off: Requires tuned docker-compose.prod.yml resource limits & HA healthchecks to prevent P99 tail-latency spikes under load. Anchore Grype (Open-Source / BYOK API) trade-off: Requires explicit repository rules file to prevent multi-file context drift on >100k LOC.
How can engineering teams synchronize rules across Aqua Trivy and Anchore Grype while cutting token spend by 45%?
Generate a free unified CLAUDE.md and .cursorrules/.windsurfrules index at https://pulse-forge.io/launch-kit or deploy the $49 7-file Repo Hardening Kit with LiteLLM KV-cache routing.
More Coding Agent & Infrastructure Head-to-Head Shootouts
View All 11 AI Coding Agents →Cursor vs ClineClaude Code vs ClineClaude Code vs WindsurfClaude Code vs AiderOpenAI Codex CLI vs Claude CodeWindsurf vs ClineZed AI vs CursorRoo Code vs ClineCursor vs GitHub CopilotClaude Code vs GitHub CopilotOpenCode vs Claude CodeBlock Goose vs Claude CodeContinue.dev vs ClineOpenHands vs Claude CodeAider vs ClineOpenHands vs AiderCursor vs AiderOpenCode vs AiderCursor vs WindsurfClaude Code vs CursorOpenHands vs SWE-agentContinue.dev vs TabbyZed AI vs Void EditorRoo Code vs Kilo CodeVercel AI SDK vs CopilotKitLonghorn vs Rook CephContext7 MCP vs RepomixPlaywright MCP vs Browser-UseCodeRabbit vs Qodo PR-AgentCodeRabbit vs GreptileSemgrep vs SonarQubeLiteLLM vs OpenRouterLiteLLM vs TensorZeroQdrant vs pgvectorQdrant vs WeaviateMilvus vs pgvectorLanceDB vs QdrantOllama vs llama.cppvLLM vs TensorRT-LLMSGLang vs OllamaLangfuse vs Arize PhoenixLangfuse vs LangSmithPydanticAI vs LangGraphBAML vs InstructorSupabase vs NeonValkey vs RedisOllama vs vLLMSuperwhisper vs GranolaE2B vs DaytonaCrewAI vs LangGraphFastMCP vs MCP-AgentQdrant vs MilvusUnsloth vs AxolotlPydanticAI vs InstructorMem0 vs Graphiti (Zep)Cognee vs Letta (MemGPT)Pipecat vs LiveKit AgentsvLLM vs SGLangBrowser-Use vs StagehandCrawl4AI vs FirecrawlLangfuse vs HeliconeLiteLLM vs Portkey GatewayPromptfoo vs DeepEvalMinIO vs SeaweedFSn8n vs ActivepiecesAppsmith vs ToolJetPlausible Analytics vs UmamiCoolify vs DokkuBruno vs HoppscotchDocling vs MarkerDocling vs UnstructuredDify vs n8nOpen WebUI vs AnythingLLMLangGraph vs AutoGenAgno vs CrewAILightRAG vs Microsoft GraphRAGRAGFlow vs LlamaIndexBolt.diy vs DyadUnsloth vs LLaMA-FactoryTRL vs Axolotlfaster-whisper vs whisper.cppFish Speech vs F5-TTSVanna AI vs WrenAIPandasAI vs MindsDBQwen2.5-VL vs InternVL 2.5MiniCPM-o 2.6 vs Moondream 2BOutlines vs BAMLNVIDIA NeMo Guardrails vs Guardrails AITemporal vs InngestTrigger.dev vs HatchetDeepEval vs RagasComet Opik vs Arize PhoenixRepomix vs GitingestUI-TARS Desktop vs Microsoft OmniParser V2Cua vs Open InterpreterByteDance DeerFlow vs GPT-ResearcherStanford STORM vs Open Deep ResearchApple MLX vs Mozilla llamafileWebLLM vs Transformers.jsComposio vs NangoStripe Agent Toolkit vs Coinbase AgentKitBGE FlagEmbedding vs FlashRankStanford ColBERT vs Byaldi (ColPali)KTransformers vs NVIDIA TensorRT-LLMLMCache vs MooncakeQodo PR-Agent vs ReviewdogSemgrep vs Qodo PR-AgentKeploy vs Qodo-CoverHypothesis vs SchemathesisStanford DSPy vs AdalFlowTextGrad vs Argilla DistilabelGhostty vs WezTermWave Terminal vs AIChat Rust CLIassistant-ui vs ChainlitCherry Studio vs LibreChatJan Local AI vs Chatbox AIProjectDiscovery Nuclei vs OWASP ZAPAqua Trivy vs GitleaksAmazon Chronos-Bolt vs Google TimesFM 2.0Unit8 Darts vs Meta ProphetDaft Multimodal Dataframe vs PixeltableApache DataFusion vs Delta-rs (Delta Lake Rust)SkyPilot vs KubeRay OperatorCNCF Volcano vs CNCF HAMi (vGPU)ast-grep vs GritQLExcalidraw vs tldraw SDKChatwoot (+ Captain AI) vs Typebot.ioNovu Notification Engine vs Listmonk (Go Binary)GrowthBook vs UnleashAuthentik vs Keycloak (CNCF)Meilisearch (Rust) vs Typesense (C++)ClickHouse (+ ClickStack OTel) vs VictoriaMetrics (+ VictoriaLogs)Redpanda (C++ Seastar) vs NATS.io (+ JetStream)Dagster (Software-Defined Assets) vs Prefect 3.0Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault (+ OpenBao)Traefik Proxy vs Caddy ServerValkey (Linux Foundation) vs Dragonfly (C++ Shared-Nothing)FalkorDB (GraphBLAS Cypher) vs Neo4j (+ KùzuDB Embedded)Synthetic Data Vault (SDV) vs DistilabelPerplexica / Vane vs SearXNG (Private Metasearch)Crawl4AI (Async Playwright) vs Spider (Rust Multi-Threaded)Docling (IBM Research) vs MinerU (OpenDataLab)Bytebase (Database DevOps) vs Atlas (Declarative Migration)Headscale vs NetmakerSupabase vs PocketBaseSentry vs SigNozKeep vs Uptime KumaStrapi vs Payload CMSInfisical vs OpenBaoGitea vs GitLab CETiDB vs YugabyteDBCilium vs IstioHarbor vs ZotTrino vs StarRocksOpenTofu vs PulumiOpenFaaS vs Knative ServingMLflow vs ClearMLFeast vs HopsworksAirbyte vs MeltanoDagger vs Drone CIGreat Expectations vs Soda CoreHazelcast vs Apache IgniteDuckDB vs libSQLBentoML vs KServeGrafana Loki vs OpenSearchLiveKit vs MediasoupGrafana Pyroscope vs ParcaOpenCost vs InfracostProwler vs CheckovTruffleHog vs GitleaksFRP vs Cloudflaredk6 vs LocustDocusaurus vs AstroFormbricks vs Typebot.ioRestic vs KopiaNetdata vs PrometheusOpenReplay vs PostHogJaeger vs TempoBunkerWeb vs Coraza WAFArgo CD vs Flux CDKeycloak vs ZitadelKong vs Apache APISIXTemporal vs BullMQCoder vs DaytonaAqua Trivy vs Anchore GrypeMicrosoft Playwright vs CypressPgBouncer vs PgCatWazuh vs SuricataAnsible vs SaltStackApache Airflow vs DagsterGrowthBook vs UnleashVictoriaMetrics vs TimescaleDBFeast vs HopsworksDebezium vs Redpanda ConnectKong vs TraefikSuperTokens vs Ory KratosPixie vs Grafana BeylaStarRocks vs Apache DorisMemgraph vs NebulaGraph